In a recent one X message relating to the NFT art world, critically acclaimed artist Claire Silver expressed concerns about a decline in artist engagement and market dynamics due to lower royalty payments.
Royalties provide creators with income from secondary sales. Silver argues that reducing or eliminating this revenue stream reduces artists’ income and discourages their involvement, leading to a less dynamic NFT industry.
The collaborating AI artist explained how cuts to royalties have led artists to devalue the idea of scarcity in their works, leading to no incentive for older collections, but only new ones. Silver adds that she is “embarrassed that the space was so short-sighted.”
Further they outlined the domino effect of royalties decisions in space: “The flow of artists stopped, so the enthusiasm left, so prices fell, so collectors stopped collecting, and suddenly we live in a ghost town that should be a citadel.”
Despite her fight that “we need royalties back,” many in the NFT community took to social media to disagree.
Source: Claire SilverProminent debate on community votes
Reflecting on Silver’s post, celebrated artist ThankYouX – who pays tribute to Andy Warhol with a graffiti-inspired tribute – suggested that platforms and speculators who prioritize short-term profits over sustainable artistic ecosystems bear a great deal of blame.
He comments, “The whole space was not short-sighted… many collectors and most artists wanted to build something new and beautiful here. The flippers and platforms were short-sighted and shot themselves in the foot.”
Despite such concerns, ThankYouX remains hopeful about the future. He believes that if OpenSea were to go bankrupt”, it could be a positive change. Moreover, he praises platforms such as Magical Eden and others who continue to respect and implement royalty agreements, unlike the former.
Notably, OpenSea faced significant backlash when it decided to do so end its tool for extracting royalties last summer.
Read more: NFT Titans raise concerns over the discontinuation of OpenSea – NFT Plazas royalty tools
Numerous voices on the social channel opposed Silver’s position, including one member to claim“It is short-sighted to blame the mechanics of royalties. This only applies IF there are consistent sales, both initial and secondary. Most artists struggle to make initial sales. Even if they do, the revenue per sale is low.”
They went on to say, “You are the exception to the rule. Royalties affect you far more than the average artist, who finds it difficult to make initial sales within their collections,” drawing a connection between this gap and Silver’s prominence in the NFT art scene.
Others supported the relevance of royalties, such as Electric Capital’s Avichal to argue“Royalties are certainly not dead. Marketplaces pay $1.5 million per week in royalties. That is much more than 0… Do you think this number is not sufficient given current trading volumes?”
The debate surrounding royalties in the NFT art world continues to be heated, highlighting the complexity and diverse perspectives within the web3 community.
Want more? Connect with NFT Plazas
Sign up for the weekly newsletter
Join our Telegram
follow us on twitter
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram
*All investment/financial opinions expressed by NFT Plazas are from the personal research and experience of our site moderators and are intended as educational materials only. Individuals are required to fully research any product before making any form of investment.