Trader Tempts Bot To Buy $1.5M Worth Of Azuki NFTs

User Avatar

In a world where technology and legal practices are intertwined, a puzzling series of events on the Blur NFT marketplace is raising legal concerns among the cryptocurrency and NFT community. Hanwe Chang — a reputable trader on the platform — skillfully tricked a competitor’s bot into buying Azuki NFTs at inflated prices.

Chang announced on Twitter that he had observed a bot mirroring his Blur bids, prompting him to do everything possible to trick it. His clever plot made him make a significant profit of $1.5 million (800 ETH).

Chang’s misleading bidding method

Chang has established himself as an NFT mogul by bidding for NFTs on the Blur platform, focusing on traits such as eye color and clothing – which affect the value of the digital asset – putting him at the top of the leaderboard of the market emerged.

In addition to his unique trait-related tactics, Chang concluded that by assembling 12 NFTs into a single digital wallet (“hanwe.eth,” according to Etherscan), a portion of the profits could be made after the transactions were completed.

Chang sold 12 Azuki NFTs with rare ‘Off White A’ background colors, all bought at the same time for $91,500 (50 ETH) each. Before the transaction, a similar Azuki NFT with the same background color sold for less than $9,000 (5 ETH), showing that its sale had an extremely steep price increase.

See also  Here's Why This Crypto Analyst Believes Bitcoin Is in a 'Prime Buy Zone'

By manipulating bots to mirror his property bids, Chang fooled a naive trader into buying the Azuki NFTs for an outrageous price.

A fraudulent or honest strategy?

Chang’s deceptive NFT sales strategy, in particular, was not funny to some That focused. The alleged owner of the bot, “elizab.eth”, took to Twitter to announce that the “funds were stolen from [their] bot”. They suggested a possible loot to get the money back, where Chang could keep 10% of the money if the balance was returned.

However, as the drama unfolds, NFT enthusiasts, including a “lawyerpublicly weighed in on the status, underlining that, despite feeling wronged, they had made a legitimate, lawfully accepted offer.

On the other hand, other users have criticized Chang’s method, warning others not to discuss fraudulent practices online and calling Chang’s money-making strategy “illegal market activity.”

This situation continues to spark conversations about regulation and ethics in NFT trading, representing the desire for greater transparency and clarity in the Web3 digital asset world.

Want more? Connect to NFT Plazas

Join the weekly newsletter
follow us on twitter
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Instagram

*All NFT Plazas investment/financial opinions are derived from the personal research and experience of our site moderators and are intended as educational material only. Individuals are required to fully research each product before making any kind of investment.



Source link

See also  Satoshi Stacker rates his picks for the best meme coin you can buy right now - Wall Street Memes
TAGGED: , , , , , , ,
Share This Article
Leave a comment